Dick’s
campaign finance manager was
so busy buying Charlie McCluskey’s soul he couldn’t be bothered with state finance laws. |
Dr. Dick was extra keen on being town
supervisor; so keen in fact that he funded his campaign entirely out of his own
pocket. As engrossed as he was in his role-playing game, he blatantly overlooked
the state campaign finance laws, filing precisely zero of the required campaign
disclosure reports until the board of elections slapped his wrist. After being
chewed out, he begrudgingly filed ONE report–still not compliant, but hey,
apparently being supervisor means you can ignore pesky laws.
Publicly available reports available on the
BOE website show Dick’s lust for the job burned so badly that he dumped half
his annual salary on getting elected – a cool $33,000. (Small wonder he reneged
on that campaign pledge to forgo his raise.) At least $5,000 of that went to
fund fawning coverage in the Village’s vanity so-called newspaper, the Hornet.
It just goes to prove that if you can’t get good coverage from real newspapers,
deep enough pockets can ensure adequate coverage from a self-published yellow
tabloid. Another $13,000 went to mailing his smarmy mugshot to residents (“Dick
who?”). Dick was sure jonesing for the supervisor job; it makes you wonder why
he doesn’t put more effort into doing what he was elected to do.
The same reports reveal a fun fact: Dick
received, count carefully, one actual campaign donation. Intriguingly,
this donation was received in February 2018 – well after the election – from an individual identified in public records as an owner of property on Old Post Road. Said property is home to number of apartments
near Aroma restaurant and Adams Fairacre Farms, and said donation was made
surprisingly soon after the owner was told he could tie into the town water line
that serves those two businesses. This will allow him to erect more apartments
there and substantially inflate the value of his property. A sterling example
of how to boost the town economy, this is not. More like a perfect example of
“pay for play” and unethical behavior. Dick: Doesn’t taking $1,000 from someone
who sat before the town board and begged for a boon seem like textbook
corruption?
As
a footnote on the subject of ethics and lack of responsibility, Dr. Dick has
not filed any other required disclosure reports, both before and subsequent to
the election. Since Mr. Shah’s money should still be sitting in Dick’s account,
such filings are required until Dick decides to stop playing elected official
and go home. Assuming the money hasn’t already disappeared into Dick’s pockets,
of course.
